Readers, are you aware of the neverending argument which started somewhere, I’m guessing, after the 40s, 1940s that is. Scholars have exacted their theories in a fashion that could be described as pseudoscience. I say that because the scholars are treating amaranth music as if it were a concrete form to be placed in a controlled envirement. I have contacted fellow composers regarding this and hope to bring you a conversation or two on the topic.
Amaranth Arthouse Music
Musical Eye Candy for Robots|JC Combs – Composer
2008
2009
2010electroshock records label
2010
Sequenza21/
- BOAC Marathon redux at MASS MoCA July 30, 2010
- Houston Mixtape #3: The Epicenter Of Noise July 28, 2010
- Christopher Stark Wins ACO’s Underwood Commission July 27, 2010
Atheist Media Blog
- Florida Church Plans 'Burn a Quran' Day on 9/11 July 30, 2010
- Bus Bench Reveals Return of Jesus? July 30, 2010
- Judge Wants Ten Commandments Monument in Tennessee Courthouse July 29, 2010
- Mike Huckabee and Tim LaHaye on Obama and the End Times July 29, 2010
- QI - The Miracle of the Herrings July 28, 2010
“There is a theory now, which is if you sound too “out there” or too “different,” you are in fact old. The avant-garde is under attack”
Is there a name for this theory (other than “inevitable result of simpering submission to the New World Order”)?
Theory, as a conjecture, not the scientific or mathmatic theory. I know I bring up science in the post, but I mean to say there is an idea, or speculation, some might believe as fact, that avant-garde music is now a genre that is over, rather than a subjective term for cutting edge music. Therefore, if you sound cutting edge, you are labeled as creating music within a genre that isn’t current. Probably an elitist, postelitist, or even postmodern idea, or all of the above. ABCDs, very academic.