<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How does one find time to write, while staying current?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://jccombs.com/2008/04/04/how-does-one-fine-time-to-write-while-staying-current/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://jccombs.com/2008/04/04/how-does-one-fine-time-to-write-while-staying-current/</link>
	<description>composer, sound artist, phonographer</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2011 07:45:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Combs</title>
		<link>http://jccombs.com/2008/04/04/how-does-one-fine-time-to-write-while-staying-current/#comment-39</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James Combs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 00:17:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jamescombs.wordpress.com/?p=72#comment-39</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Theory, as a conjecture, not the scientific or mathmatic theory.  I know I bring up science in the post, but I mean to say there is an idea, or speculation, some might believe as fact, that avant-garde music is now a genre that is over, rather than a subjective term for cutting edge music.  Therefore, if you sound cutting edge, you are labeled as creating music within a genre that isn&#039;t current.  Probably an elitist, postelitist, or even postmodern idea, or all of the above.  ABCDs, very academic.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Theory, as a conjecture, not the scientific or mathmatic theory.  I know I bring up science in the post, but I mean to say there is an idea, or speculation, some might believe as fact, that avant-garde music is now a genre that is over, rather than a subjective term for cutting edge music.  Therefore, if you sound cutting edge, you are labeled as creating music within a genre that isn&#8217;t current.  Probably an elitist, postelitist, or even postmodern idea, or all of the above.  ABCDs, very academic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bobro</title>
		<link>http://jccombs.com/2008/04/04/how-does-one-fine-time-to-write-while-staying-current/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bobro]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2008 07:57:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jamescombs.wordpress.com/?p=72#comment-32</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;There is a theory now, which is if you sound too “out there” or too “different,” you are in fact old.  The avant-garde is under attack&quot; 

Is there a name for this theory (other than &quot;inevitable result of simpering submission to the New World Order&quot;)?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;There is a theory now, which is if you sound too “out there” or too “different,” you are in fact old.  The avant-garde is under attack&#8221; </p>
<p>Is there a name for this theory (other than &#8220;inevitable result of simpering submission to the New World Order&#8221;)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

